Legal Opinion

Ager v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 17, 1907No. 482PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Accusation of cheating and swindling, from city court of Americus—Judge Crisp. April 15, 1907.

1Opinion of the CourtPowell, J.

1. The name “Amerieus Furniture & Undertaking Company” connotes a corporation; an allegation, in a criminal accusation, that this company is a corporation, is surplusage and. need not be proved. The admission of secondary evidence tending to prove such allegation is therefore harmless error, where the corporate entity has not been put in issue. Crawford v. State, 68 Ga. 822; Mattox v. State, 115 Ga. 221, 41 S. E. 700; Alsobrook v. State, 126 Ga. 102, 54 S. E. 805.

Accusation of cheating and swindling, from city court of Americus—Judge Crisp. April 15, 1907. Submitted May 27, Decided June 17,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mattox v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Mulkey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  3. Crawford v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  4. Alsobrook v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Robinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  2. Minchew v. Nahunta Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  3. Carter v. Spiegel, May Stern Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  4. Foley & Williams Manufacturing Co. v. Bell & HarrellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  5. Hornsby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API