Ravitz v. Steurele, Justice of the Peace

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Richardson

Affirming.

These appeals present identical questions, and will therefore be disposed of as one.

In the first entitled action a motion to dismiss, because the questions involved in it are moot, is overruled. The paramount question to be determined is the constitutional validity of an Act of 1934, c. 17, p. 32, entitled:

“An Act to define, license, and regulate the business of making loans or advancements in the amount or of the value of three hundred dollars [$300] or less, secured or unsecured, at a greater rate of interest, consideration, or charge than…