Legal Opinion
R. Milo Gilbert v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 19, 1961No. 17034_1PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARNES, Circuit Judge.
A complaint, charging forgery (18 U.S.C. § 495) of a certain check (United States Treasury check number 11,260,-576, dated June 2, 1958, in the amount of $848.11) was filed before a United States Commissioner on January 2, 1959. On the same day a warrant for the arrest of the appellant was issued,1 requiring ap*588pellant to answer the complaint relating to the forgery of the one check described above.
Appellant was an accountant specializing in preparing income tax returns for clients and in advising his clients concerning their form, the inclusions, and the deductions.…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Agnello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- United States v. Ernest T. PageCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Gilbert v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Gordon Vincent Eastman and Anthony Hueston A/K/A Tony Heston, A/K/A Tony Dejest. Nos. 71-1643, 71-1644Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- R. Milo Gilbert v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Boyce Leon Mosco and Fred John Hansen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.