Legal Opinion

R. Milo Gilbert v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 13, 1966No. 19060PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KOELSCH, Circuit Judge.

This case is here for the second time. Part of its background and general nature appears from this succinct statement contained in the Supreme Court’s opinion in Gilbert v. United States, 370 U.S. 650, 82 S.Ct. 1399, 8 L.Ed.2d 750 (1962): “Petitioner” (i. e., appellant Gilbert), “an accountant whose business included acting for others in federal income tax matters, was charged in a thirty-five-count indictment with violations of 26 U.S.C. § 7206(2), 18 U.S.C. § 1001 and 18 U.S.C. § 495, in that he had allegedly falsified his clients’ returns (§ 7206(2)), forged their…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Lawn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Sinclair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. In Re the Accounting of TottenNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  5. United States v. GillilandSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State v. WarnerOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. United States v. Alex DandyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  3. United States v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  4. United States v. DabbsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  5. United States v. Andres Ruelas-ArreguinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API