Legal Opinion

State v. Bailey

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 14, 1987No. B68-768; CA A42865PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarden, P. J.

Defendant was convicted in a jury trial of theft in the second degree, ORS 164.045(1), 1 for eating and not paying for an 87 cent package of cashews from the stock in her employer’s grocery store. She appeals, and we reverse.

Defendant first contends that the trial court erred in excluding evidence that it was the employer’s policy or practice to allow employes to eat food from the store and pay for it later. 2 We agree. At trial, defendant testified that she had intended to pay for the package of cashews but forgot to do so when “she got busy talking” to the cashier. She thus asserted the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. HansenOregon Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. EnakievCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  2. State v. GuritzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  3. State v. AdonriCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. State v. ReederCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  5. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API