State v. Adonri
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
Defendant appeals his convictions for first-degree rape and first-degree sodomy. ORS 163.365; ORS 163.405. He contends that the trial court erred by admitting rebuttal testimony from one of the child’s teachers that she held the opinion that the child was truthful. We affirm.
Defendant was accused of raping and sodomizing a child. The child testified at trial and recounted the details of the crimes. Defendant testified at trial. Defendant denied the charges and stated that he thought that the charges were related to a potential custody problem. Defense counsel asked one of the defense…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wynn v. SundquistOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. CarrOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. RenlyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Meislahn v. DemorestCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- State v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
3Cited by3 opinions
- People of Guam v. Danilo Santos MoralesSupreme Court of Guam · 2022
- State v. DuganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- State v. Henderson-LairdCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016