Legal Opinion

State v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 1926No. 19682. Department TwoPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

— This action was brought to recover the balance claimed to be due upon a surety bond. A trial to the court without a jury resulted in findings of fact, conclusions of law and a judgment denying recovery, from which the state, the plaintiff, appeals.

The facts are not in dispute and may be summarized as follows: The First National Bank of Clarkston on February 8, 1924, was a state depositary to the extent of $15,000, and on that date became insolvent. The state was secured by liberty bonds of the par value of $7,000, which the bank had deposited as collateral and had given to- the state a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gregg v. HinkleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Paulsell v. PetersWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Warren v. Washington Trust BankWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Grays Harbor CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Inland-Ryerson Construction Products Co. v. Brazier Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  5. Douglass v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API