Legal Opinion

Gregg v. Hinkle

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1924No. 2931PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT.

BOTTS, J.

The Exchange-Bank of Carrizzozo closed its doors on October 8, 1923, and thereafter the ap-pellees were appointed receivers thereof. The bank had previously qualified as a depository of state-monej^s, and, at the time of closing, had on deposit state funds in the sum of $72,725.05. The deposit was secured by (1) a depository bond in the penal sum of $5,000, with the American Surety Company as surety; (2) a depository bond in the penal sum of $5,000, with the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company as surety; (3) depository bonds aggregating a total penal sum of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Yellowstone County v. First Trust & Savings BankMontana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. In re State Treasurer's SettlementNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Fremont County v. Fremont County BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  4. Village of Wyoming v. Citizens' Trust & Guaranty Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1917

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. City of GalvestonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  2. State v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1926
  3. City of Cheyenne v. Maryland Casualty Co.District Court, D. Wyoming · 1926
  4. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Village of MaywoodAppellate Court of Illinois · 1931
  5. Board of County Commissioners v. MasonWyoming Supreme Court · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API