Legal Opinion

Peterson Builders, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided January 8, 1993No. 91-1406CPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

FUTEY, Judge.

This matter is before the court on plaintiff’s motion for leave to file its first supplemental and amended complaint. Plaintiff seeks to add an amended claim of duress to its complaint and to reduce the amount claimed in the prayer for relief. Defendant opposes the motion only insofar as it seeks to add a claim of duress to the complaint.

Factual Background

On September 22, 1992, this court entered judgment dismissing a claim of duress, in Count III of plaintiff’s original complaint, for failure to present the claim to the contracting officer (CO) as required by the Contract…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  2. White Plains Iron Works, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  3. Peterson Builders, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
  4. Boeing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Al Munford, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  2. Hamilton Securities Advisory Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API