Legal Opinion

United States v. Alexander

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided August 5, 1988No. ACM 26829PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

HODGSON, Chief Judge:

The appellant claims that the evidence supporting his conviction1 for cocaine abuse was improperly obtained by the government after he had voluntarily sought assistance for his drug problem. See Air Force Regulation 30-2, 18 April 1986, Social Actions Programs, para. 4-2 et seq [hereinafter AFR 30-2].

The parties at trial joined in a stipulation .of fact outlining the circumstances that uncovered the evidence on which the government’s case is based. It was this stipulation that the trial judge relied upon in denying the appellant’s suppression motion.

The agreed to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. BarbeauU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1980
  2. United States v. ForbesU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
  3. United States v. LittlehalesU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. WakinU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1988
  2. United States v. CatanoUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2015
  3. United States v. WoodU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989
  4. United States v. CatanoUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2015
  5. United States v. CatanoUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API