Legal Opinion

Nave v. Taggart

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 9, 1995No. F019626PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BUCKLEY, J.

Procedural History

For purposes of the narrow issue presented on appeal, the genesis of this case began with the trial court’s order granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment, which order directed defendants to prepare “a formal order.” On February 22, 1993, plaintiff filed and noticed a motion for reconsideration. On February 24, the formal order granting summary judgment was filed, and on February 25, judgment upon the order of summary judgment was entered. On March 4, 1993, defendants mailed notice of entry of judgment and order. Plaintiff’s notice of appeal was not…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. County of Alameda v. CarlesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Estate of Hanley v. HanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Stratton v. First National Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  4. Phillips v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Stevens v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Garcia v. HejmadiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  2. People v. CastelloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Ballona Wetlands Land Trust v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. Kerns v. CSE Insurance GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. DARLING, HALL & RAE v. KrittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API