Boorman v. STATE COMPENSATION DEPARTMENT
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLangtry, J.
Plaintiff suffered an industrial accident which resulted in total loss of one eye and most of the vision in the other. His total vision loss,-based on vision for two eyes (binocular vision), was variously estimated in evidence from 72% to 91.6%. On the basis of his own testimony and supporting evidence that he was by this injury rendered incapable of performing gainful employment, claimant contends he is entitled to workmen’s compensation for permanent total' disability.
In this series of de novo hearings and appeals, the hearing officer, who was the only one who saw and heard the witnesses,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Chebot v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Kajundzich v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1940
- Jones v. State Compensation DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- Keyworth v. MillsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1919
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hannan v. Good Samaritan HospitalCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
- Matter of Compensation of BrackeOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Trent v. State Compensation DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
- Giese v. Safeway StoresCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
- Johnson v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.