Miller v. Pelzer
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.
Demurrer to a complaint was sustained by trial court and plaintiff has appealed. Plaintiff, in her complaint, alleges that defendants are husband and wife; that on July 15, 1887, plaintiff .was born out of lawful wedlock, and shortly thereafter defendants took her into their home, and, for a valuable consideration paid them by Olmsted county, defendants agreed to keep and care for plaintiff until she became 18 years of age; that, pursuant to this arrangement plaintiff entered the home of the defendants in the year 1887, and she lived there continuously until May 1, 1912, when she married.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hewlett v. GeorgeMississippi Supreme Court · 1891
- Roller v. RollerWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- McKelvey v. McKelveyTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
- Taubert v. TaubertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Cooper v. CooperMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Dunlap v. DunlapSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1930
- Balts v. BaltsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Silesky Ex Rel. Silesky v. KelmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Rigdon Ex Rel. Rigdon v. RigdonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1971
- Worrell v. WorrellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1939
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.