Legal Opinion

In re Dick

California Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1966No. Crim. No. 9536PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.

Petitioner, by this application for the writ of habeas corpus, seeks relief from his confinement in San Quentin Prison under a judgment of conviction on seven counts of issuing checks without sufficient funds (Pen. Code, § 476a), with two prior felony convictions. The judgment was affirmed on appeal and is now final. (People v. Dick, 200 Cal.App.2d 424 [19 Cal.Rptr. 317].)

The only issue of substance in this collateral attack on the judgment concerns the propriety of the multiple convictions, as felonies, arising out of petitioner’s issuance of a series of checks with insufficient funds. Prior…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. In Re LopezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. In Re TartarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. People v. KennedyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. People v. DickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. State v. FerrisNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. In Re WatkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. State v. BakerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
  5. Nettles v. NewlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API