Legal Opinion

In Re Watkins

California Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1966No. Crim. 10018PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

-Petitioner seeks a writ of habeas corpus or coram nobis.

Facts: On March 14, 1958, a complaint was filed in the Municipal Court for the San Leandro-Hayward Judicial District charging petitioner, in three counts, with felony violations of section 476a of the Penal Code (issuing checks with insufficient funds). The checks in the second and third counts were in the amounts of $17.71 and $41.20, respectively.

On May 28, 1958, petitioner pleaded guilty to violations of section 476a of the Penal Code as charged in the second and third counts of the complaint. The first count was dismissed on motion…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. People v. ShipmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. In Re LindleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. In Re AtchleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. In Re De La RoiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. In Re RosencrantzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In Re AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Cumbest v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. FerrisNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. People v. HinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. People v. RochaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API