Nettles v. Newland
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
Garyon Nettles appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition. We must determine whether the state court unreasonably applied: (1) Bouie v. City of Columbia, 378 U.S. 347, 84 S.Ct. 1697, 12 L.Ed.2d 894 (1964), by determining that multiple incidents of passing bad checks could be aggregated into one felony count for charging, or (2) Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 87 S.Ct. 824, 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967), by determining that the failure to give a unanimity instruction was harmless. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.1
T…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Richardson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Nettles v. Newland, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2005