Legal Opinion

Brown v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 12, 2011No. 11-1441PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioners Bennett Brown, Dr. Robert Schultes, Pamela Mackey Taylor, and Iowa Physicians for Social Responsibility seek review of a decision by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) under the Atomic Energy Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2201, et seq., to renew the operating license of the Duane Arnold Energy Center (DAEC) in Palo, Iowa. The three joint owners of DAEC are intervenors in this action. For the reasons stated below, we dismiss the petition for review as untimely.

The Administrative Orders Review Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2341, et seq. (Hobbs Act), confers jurisdiction in courts of appeals to review…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chem-Haulers, Inc. v. The United States of America and the Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  2. Mesa Airlines v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  3. Nebraska State Legislative Board v. Rodney SlaterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  4. Energy Probe and Western Reserve Alliance v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
  5. United States Department of Agriculture v. Jack Kelly and Erma KellyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Greenley v. Laborers' International UnionDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2017
  2. Aquilar v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API