Hair v. Burnell
U.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Iowa
Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
1Opinion of the Court
McPHEKSOK, District Judge.
In October, 188G, at the suit of plaintiff herein against defendant Burnell in an action at law on due proceedings, this court, having undisputed jurisdiction, rendered a judgment in favor of said Hair and against said Burnell for a sum greater than $3,000, with interest and costs. In September, 1900, that judgment was credited with §500 on account of a levy on and sale of some corporation stock, the subject of controversy herein. Other than said credit, the judgment is in no part satisfied, and is yet in full force. In August, 1900, a writ of execution was issued by…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wayman v. SouthardSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
- Riggs v. Johnson CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1868
- The Board of Commr's of Knox County v. AspinwallSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
- Memphis v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Ottumwa Screen Co. v. StodghillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dooley v. Gladiator Consolidated Gold Mines & Milling Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- State ex rel. Burg v. Milwaukee Medical CollegeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
- State v. New York-Mexican Oil Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1923
- Tudor v. BeathIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
- Mixson v. First Natl. Bank of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.