Legal Opinion

Kliks v. Courtemanche

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1935PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiff to recover damages for the alleged conversion by the defendant of certain personal property in Yamhill county, Oregon. The facts in the case are substantially as follows: On October 13, 1933, one W. 0. Phelps, a farmer, suddenly and unexpectedly departed from the state, after disposing of some of the personal property covered by a mortgage held by the plaintiff. He left on the farm which he had occupied, along with other personal property, the implements involved in this litigation, possession of which is claimed by the plaintiff under her chattel…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Van Winkle v. CrowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Bartholomew v. BartonNew York Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Davis v. WOOD ET UX.Oregon Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Dudley v. DickieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  3. Caldwell Finance Co. v. Samuel A. McAllister Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Estate of Oscar Herman Herreid, BankruptCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  4. Dudley v. DickieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API