Bartholomew v. Barton
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of Justice’s Court in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant for the sum of $131 damages and costs. The county judge, being disqualified by reason of relationship to one of the parties, certified the appeal to the Supreme Court.
1Opinion of the CourtNichols, J.
On June 27, 1921, one Frank Schell purchased of the plaintiff, Bartholomew, a team of horses, one being a sorrel horse called Dan, and the other a bay mare known as the Sitzer horse, for which team he agreed to pay the sum of $250. At the time of said purchase, the said Schell also owned a bay mare eleven yéars old called the Rose mare, a Walter A. Wood mowing machine, a lumber wagon, hay rigging and five tons of hay. To secure the payment to Bartholomew of the purchase price of the team so purchased, $250, Schell on that day executed an agreement in writing which provided for the payment to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Crowe v. . Liquid Carbonic Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Tweedie v. ClarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dudley v. DickieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Kliks v. CourtemancheOregon Supreme Court · 1935
- Dudley v. DickieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960