Legal Opinion
Wake Forest v. . Medlin
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided July 2, 1930PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Civil action to recover penalty for violation of town ordinance.
On 29 January, 1929, the board of commissioners of the town of Wake Forest, pursuant to charter and general statutory authority, duly adopted an ordinance, the pertinent part of which is as follows:
"1. That from and after the first day of February, 1929, it shall be unlawful to erect, build, maintain or operate any station for the sale or distribution of gasoline, kerosene, or any other petroleum products in any part of the town of Wake Forest west of the Seaboard Air Line Railway tracks."
The penalty for violating said ordinance…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Butchers' Benevolent Ass'n v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Reinman v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Turner v. . New BernSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Town of Clinton v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- State v. . VanhookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. BallanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- State v. . BallanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Leary v. AdamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Kirby v. North Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016
- State v. JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.