Legal Opinion

Alexander v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 3, 1938No. Civ. 11901PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

This is a proceeding in mandamus to compel respondent court to make an order permitting petitioner to prosecute an action filed by him and now pending in said court without the prepayment of jury fees.

The material facts are:

The petition herein alleged that petitioner had “no means of paying the fees necessary to secure a trial by jury”, which allegation was denied in the answer filed by respondents. At the time of the hearing before this court petitioner testified that his average income for the past year was from $110 to $115 per month.

This is the sole question necessary for determination:

May…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. JamesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  2. Gomez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Jenkins v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. County of Sutter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  2. Camacho v. Corte de Distrito de BayamónSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API