People v. James
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.
The two defendants were tried jointly before a jury on an information charging robbery. The verdict was guilty of robbery in the second degree. From the judgment following the verdict and from the order denying their motion for a new trial both defendants have appealed upon a single typewritten record.
The appellants raise two points—the discretion of the trial court in permitting the district attorney to read to the jury testimony of the complaining witness given upon the preliminary hearing, and misconduct of the district attorney in his argument to the jury.
The testimony was read under…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. BragdonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- People v. FayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- People v. UdellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. McIlvainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- People v. HidalgoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- People v. BuyleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- People v. ChilcottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- People v. GregoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.