Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Anderson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 1958No. 34555PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, C. J.

The issue, sought to be ráiséd, is the validity of a default divorce. We never reach the real issue because Thelma V. Anderson abandoned the route of direct attack upon the divorce decree to follow the dead-end roads of collateral attacks.

It appears that Albert B. Anderson and Thelma V. Anderson desired a divorce; that, together, they consulted an attorney who prepared, at their request, a property-settlement agreement and a divorce complaint with Mr. Anderson as the plaintiff. Mrs. Anderson accepted service of the summons and complaint the same day that the property settlement was signed,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re Peterson's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Dockery v. Central Arizona Light & Power Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Dwyer v. NolanWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Crockett v. CrockettWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Thompson v. ShortWashington Supreme Court · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Osborne v. OsborneWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Mueller v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  3. State v. PetersenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
  4. State v. ScheelWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  5. In Re The Welfare Of: K.d., Danielle Graves v. DcyfCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API