Legal Opinion

Buckles v. Morristown Kayo Company

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided May 10, 1955No. Civ. A. 980PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT L. TAYLOR, District Judge.

This action was commenced in a state court against resident corporations by two resident plaintiffs, who were later joined by two intervening plaintiffs, to recover overtime wages under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq., particularly § 216(b). Defendants removed the case to the United States District Court on the ground that the right asserted by plaintiffs is one arising under a law of the United States. 28 U.S.C. § 1441(b). An additional ground stated is that the District Court has original jurisdiction of the ease, it being one within…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Robertson v. Argus Hosiery Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
  2. Asher v. William L. Crow Const. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Lockard v. Equifax, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  2. Haun v. Retail Credit Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Curtis P. BALDWIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  4. Vann v. JacksonDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1958
  5. Niswander v. Paul Hardeman, Inc.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1963

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API