State v. Keener
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Laurie and Asa Keener appealed criminal judgments entered after a jury found each of them guilty of two counts of criminal conspiracy. Laurie Keener also appealed an amended criminal judgment entered after the district court ordered restitution. We affirm the criminal judgments and amended criminal judgment, concluding the record on direct appeal is inadequate to permit review of the Keeners’ claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, the district court did not commit obvious error in admitting deposition testimony of Marvin and Florence Whisker, the Keeners…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Mickens v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. BlurtonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. HolbachNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. GlaumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
- State v. AtkinsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. ForeidNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.