Matusevitz v. Hughes
Montana Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Silver Bow County; William Clancy, Judge. ActioN by Nannie Matusevitz against Lillie R. Hughes, ad-ministratrix of the estate of S. J. Reynolds, deceased. Thei*e was judgment for defendant, and from an order denying a new trial the plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Milburn
This cause is before us upon appeal. At the time when appellant’s brief was filed, September 5, 1899, the following rule of this court was, and now is, in force, to-wit:
“(3) Contents of Brief. The appellant’s brief shall contain, in the. order here stated:
“(a) A concise abstract or statement of the case, presenting succinctly the questions involved, and the manner in which they are raised, which abstract shall refer to the page numbers in the transcript in such manner that pleadings, evidence, orders and judgment may be easily found. * * *” (Rule X, 22 Mont, xxxiv, 51 Pac. vii.)
The statement…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Smith v. DenniffMontana Supreme Court · 1899
- Rehberg v. GreiserMontana Supreme Court · 1900
- McCleary v. CrowleyMontana Supreme Court · 1899
- McDonald v. AtkinsNebraska Supreme Court · 1882
- Gibson v. HubbardMontana Supreme Court · 1899
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. HowardMontana Supreme Court · 1904
- Gardiner v. Eclipse Grocery Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1925
- Wing v. BrasherMontana Supreme Court · 1921
- King v. Pony Gold Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1903
- State v. RogersMontana Supreme Court · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.