Legal Opinion

Thomas v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 6, 1988No. 87-376PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELSON, Associate Judge:

Is an injured worker entitled to a hearing and compensation award under the District of Columbia Workers’ Compensation Act of 1979, D.C. Code §§ 36-301 to -345 (1988), even though no material issues are in dispute and the self-insured employer is voluntarily paying benefits under the Act? The District of Columbia Department of Employment Services answered that question in the negative, determining that such a worker does not have an absolute right to either a hearing or the issuance of an award of compensation. Petitioner, Katherine L. Thomas, seeks review, asserting…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Federal Communications Commission v. SchreiberSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  4. Intercounty Constraction Corp. v. WalterSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Tuten v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Grayson v. AT & T CORP.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Perry v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Hood v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. District of Columbia v. MorrisseyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. D.C. Appleseed Center for Law & Justice, Inc. v. District of Columbia Department of Insurance, Securities, & BankingDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API