Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Grogan v. Wanamaker
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided February 11, 1942No. 28869PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.
The decision of this case rests upon whether Section 12000, General Code, is still in effect and still means what it did when enacted. This section provides:
“Upon application of a party and his or her affidavit that a fair and impartial hearing and determination can not be had before the court in which a petition for divorce or alimony is filed, a change of venue shall be allowed, and the cause removed to some county in the same judicial district for hearing and determination. ’ ’
In refusing to grant a peremptory writ of mandamus commanding the transfer of the divorce case to another county…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State ex rel. Chute v. MarshallOhio Supreme Court · 1922
- Hedland v. Lones, JudgeOhio Supreme Court · 1934
- Lesh v. LeshOhio Supreme Court · 1941
- Easterday v. EasterdayOhio Supreme Court · 1936
3Cited by6 opinions
- Flora Realty & Investment Co. v. City of LadueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. SavordOhio Supreme Court · 1950
- State Ex Rel. Allied Chemical Co. v. AureliusOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
- State Ex Rel. Keller v. BirrellOhio Supreme Court · 1948
- State ex rel. Pratt v. WeygandtOhio Supreme Court · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.