Legal Opinion · Dissent

State ex rel. Pratt v. Weygandt

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1956No. 34159Published

1DissentTaft, J.

In my opinion, when an affidavit of prejudice with respect to a common pleas judge such as the affidavit involved in the instant case is filed with the clerk of a Common Pleas Court as it was in the instant ease, the clerk has a mandatory duty to “enter the fact of such filing on the trial docket in such cause and forthwith notify the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court,” who “shall designate and assign some other judge to take the place of the judge against whom such affidavit is filed.” Of course, the Chief Justice is authorized to determine whether the affidavit sets forth the required *472“fact…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. U'ren v. BagleyOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  3. State ex rel. Anaconda Copper Mining Co. v. ClancyMontana Supreme Court · 1904
  4. State Ex Rel. Turner v. MarshallOhio Supreme Court · 1931
  5. State ex rel. Chute v. MarshallOhio Supreme Court · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API