Legal Opinion

Perez-Sandi v. Berges

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 16, 1929No. 13,154PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWesterfield, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment condemning her to pay to plaintiff $500 as damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff due to his having been bitten by a dog alleged to have been owned or harbored by defendant. Defendant admits that plaintiff was bitten by the dog and seriously injured, but denies that she is responsible upon the ground that she was not the owner of the dog, which it is alleged was a gentle and not a vicious dog, and that plaintiff’s injuries were entirely due to his own fault in that he “insisted on attacking said dog and was bitten by said dog only after he had…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bentz v. PageSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
  2. Delisle v. BourriagueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
  3. Mercer v. MarstonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. Loyacano v. JurgensSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1898
  5. Martinez v. BernhardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Marsalis v. La SalleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
  2. Hartman v. AschaffenburgLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. Urk v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Tamburello v. JaegerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1966
  5. Danove v. MahoneyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API