Legal Opinion
Hartman v. Aschaffenburg
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided March 1, 1943No. 17849PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Plaintiff, Mrs. Ethel Hartman, alleges that she was bitten on two different occasions by a dog of defendant, E. Lysle Aschaffenburg. The first attack is alleged to have been made on September 17, 1937, at about 8 o'clock in the morning, on the sidewalk of Josephine Street between St. Charles Avenue and Carondelet Street. The second is alleged to have taken place at about the same place on April 21, 1938.
On the first occasion, she states that she had carried her own "little Boston Bull" across the street and had put him down upon the sidewalk, and that as she was leaning over to "unsnap the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Damonte v. PattonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
- Mercer v. MarstonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
- Loyacano v. JurgensSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1898
- Montgomery v. KoesterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1883
- Daly v. KielSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. SoileauCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
- Ashley v. Nissan Motor Corp. in USALouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
- Owen v. HampsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
- Groner v. HedrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Domingue v. Continental Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.