State v. Schaer
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
TERNUS, Chief Justice.
The appellant, David Schaer, appeals his conviction of domestic assault with intent to commit serious injury and of willful injury. On appeal, he claims the trial court’s admission of hearsay testimony identifying him as the perpetrator of the assault violated his rights under the Confrontation Clauses of the United States and Iowa Constitutions. On a divided vote, the court of appeals affirmed his conviction, preserving one of his claims for a possible postconviction-relief action. Upon our review, we conclude all of the defendant’s claims lack merit. Therefore, we…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- State v. GravesSupreme Court of Iowa · 2003
- People v. CageCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- State v. DudleySupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
- State of Iowa v. Scottize Danyelle BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
- State of Iowa v. Christopher Clay McNealSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
- Kent A. Simmons Vs. State Public DefenderSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
- State v. HarperSupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.