Legal Opinion

State of Iowa v. Christopher Clay McNeal

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 23, 2017No. 15–1606PublishedCited by 96 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANSFIELD, Justice.

In this case, we are asked to review a district • court’s decision to commence a criminal trial on June 26 but to postpone the presentation of evidence to July 7, eight days after the June 29 expiration of the speedy trial deadline. The court grant*700ed this postponement at the State’s request based on the unavailability of medical experts.

On our review, we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion. We assume without deciding that the district court’s use of a start-and-stop procedure to avoid the speedy trial deadline should be analyzed under the same standards…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. State v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1993
  2. State of Iowa v. Andrew James LopezSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  3. State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2008
  4. State Of Iowa Vs. Calvin Clarence Nelson, Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  5. State of Iowa v. Jesus Angel RamirezSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by96 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Kenneth L. LillySupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
  2. State of Iowa v. Lee Samuel ChristensenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
  3. Alejandro Lira v. State of IowaCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2020
  4. Ambrashia Marie Chrzan v. State of IowaCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2024
  5. Antonio Lamar Hudson v. State of IowaCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2021

91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API