Legal Opinion

Feighley v. C. Hoffman & Son Milling Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 12, 1917No. 20,023; No. 20,175PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeals from Dickinson district court; Roswell L. King, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

Two actions were brought against the C. Hoffman & Son Milling Company, the Hoffman Elevator Company, C. Hoffman, C. B. Hoffman and'the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company — one by J. H. Feighley and the other by John J. Widler, to'recover damages for'injuries resulting from an overflow of the Smoky Hill river, alleged to have been caused by the joint action and wrong of the defendants.

It appears that a number of actions were commenced by other plaintiffs, all growing out of the same circumstances, of which one has already…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Edens v. FletcherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  2. Central Branch Union Pacific Railroad v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  3. City of Topeka v. BrooksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  4. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. MosherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  5. Arnold v. C. Hoffman & Son Milling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Black v. MartinMontana Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Jacobson v. ParrillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  3. Jacobsen v. WoernerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  4. Sade v. HemstromSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  5. Scott ex rel. Scott v. Kansas State Fair Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API