Legal Opinion

Arnold v. C. Hoffman & Son Milling Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 10, 1914No. 18,962PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Dickinson district court; Roswell L. King, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*55The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

L. D. Arnold, the appellant, brought this action against the appellees, The C. Hoffman & Son Milling Company, C. Hoffman, C. B. Hoffman, The Hoffman Elevator Company, and the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company, to recover damages resulting from an overflow of the Smoky Hill river and the destruction of his crops, caused, as it was alleged, by the joint action and wrong of the appellees. The case has been here before on appeal. (Arnold v. Milling Co., 86 Kan. 12, 119 Pac. 373.) Appellant'alleged that he owned land on the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McDaniel v. City of CherryvaleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  2. Luengene v. Consumers Light, Heat & Power Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  3. Arnold v. C. Hoffman & Son Milling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1911

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Moore v. Associated Material & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  2. Mosby v. Manhattan Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  3. Evans v. Massman Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1938
  4. Grace v. Union Electric Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1947
  5. Davis v. WallaceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API