Legal Opinion

Downen's, Inc. v. City of Hawaiian Gardens Redevelopment Agency

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 30, 2001No. B132012PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GILBERT, P. J.

A government agency pays only a portion of a judgment against it for inverse condemnation. In this case of first impression, we hold that Code of Civil Procedure section 1036 1 authorizes litigation expenses to the prevailing plaintiff in an action to enforce the inverse condemnation judgment under Government Code section 970 et seq. We therefore reverse the trial court’s decision to tax costs and remand with directions to award litigation expenses.

Facts

Appellants Downen’s, Inc., and Mary and Dave Downen (Downens) owned and operated Lakewood Suzuki, an automobile…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. People v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Delaney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. County of Los Angeles v. FausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Younger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Conservatorship of McQueenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Ass'n v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  3. SANTA ANA UNIFIED SD v. Orange CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. Andre v. City of West SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. T.O. IX, LLC v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API