Henry A. Wess, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Re, Chief Judge:
The question presented in this case pertains to the proper classification, for customs duty purposes, of certain merchandise imported from Japan. The customs invoices described the merchandise as “mechanical device whiskey bottle” and “battery operated mechanical device for bottles.”
The merchandise was classified by the customs officials as “[tjoys,- and parts of toys, not specially provided for: * * * Other.” under item 737.90 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States ‘[TSUSJ. Consequently, it was assessed with duty at the rate of 35% ad valorem. ' Plaintiff contests the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- The United States v. New York Merchandise Co., Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- Wilson's Customs Clearance, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- Ideal Toy Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Beacon Cycle & Supply Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978