Legal Opinion

J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 14, 1969No. C.D. 3822PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Maletz, Judge:

This case involves the proper tariff classification of certain “meter irises” which are components of built-in exposure correcting systems of Bell & Howell eight-millimeter motion-picture cameras. The meter irises were imported from West Germany and entered at Chicago in September and November 1966 by plaintiff as customs broker for the Bell & Howell company. They were classified by the district director of customs in Chicago under item 722.32 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States as other parts for motion-picture cameras, and assessed with duty at 15 percent ad valorem.

Pl…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  2. United States v. Wyman & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Porter v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
  2. Fedtro, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974
  3. C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  4. United States v. PorterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
  5. Ideal Toy Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API