J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Maletz, Judge:
This case involves the proper tariff classification of certain “meter irises” which are components of built-in exposure correcting systems of Bell & Howell eight-millimeter motion-picture cameras. The meter irises were imported from West Germany and entered at Chicago in September and November 1966 by plaintiff as customs broker for the Bell & Howell company. They were classified by the district director of customs in Chicago under item 722.32 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States as other parts for motion-picture cameras, and assessed with duty at 15 percent ad valorem.
Pl…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- United States v. Wyman & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
3Cited by12 opinions
- Porter v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
- Fedtro, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974
- C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- United States v. PorterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
- Ideal Toy Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.