Legal Opinion

State v. K.L.B.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 2014No. 88270-3PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtC. Johnson, J.

¶1 The main issue in this case is whether a Sound Transit fare enforcement officer (FEO) is a “public servant” as defined in RCW 9A.04.110(23). Fifteen-year-old K.L.B. was charged with making a false or misleading statement to FEO Brett Willet under RCW 9A.76.175, which provides that it is a misdemeanor to knowingly make “a false or misleading material statement to a public servant.” The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s conclusion that under the statute, FEO Willet was a public servant at the time K.L.B. made the false statement. We hold that under these circumstances, because FEOs…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. RoggenkampWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. RoggenkampWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Simpson Inv. Co. v. State, Dept. of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Jongeward v. BNSF Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State v. GrahamWashington Supreme Court · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. ConoverWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Potelco, Inc. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  3. Cent. Puget Sound Reg'l Transit Auth. v. WR-Sri 120th N. LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State v. Valdiglesias LaValleWashington Supreme Court · 2023
  5. In re the Parental Rights to K.M.M.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API