State v. K.L.B.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtC. Johnson, J.
¶1 The main issue in this case is whether a Sound Transit fare enforcement officer (FEO) is a “public servant” as defined in RCW 9A.04.110(23). Fifteen-year-old K.L.B. was charged with making a false or misleading statement to FEO Brett Willet under RCW 9A.76.175, which provides that it is a misdemeanor to knowingly make “a false or misleading material statement to a public servant.” The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s conclusion that under the statute, FEO Willet was a public servant at the time K.L.B. made the false statement. We hold that under these circumstances, because FEOs…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. RoggenkampWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. RoggenkampWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Simpson Inv. Co. v. State, Dept. of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Jongeward v. BNSF Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. GrahamWashington Supreme Court · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. ConoverWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- Potelco, Inc. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Cent. Puget Sound Reg'l Transit Auth. v. WR-Sri 120th N. LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. Valdiglesias LaValleWashington Supreme Court · 2023
- In re the Parental Rights to K.M.M.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.