Legal Opinion
George Haug Co., Inc. v. Rolls Royce Motor Cars Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 24, 1998No. Docket 97-9238PublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POLLACK, Senior District Judge.
From 1967 until November 10, 1995, plaintiff (“Haug”) was an authorized .parts and service dealer of Rolls Royce automobiles in New York County. The defendant, Rolls Royce Motorcars, Inc. (“Rolls Royce”) is an importer and wholesaler of Rolls Royce automobiles and parts and is the distributor thereof. Rolls Royce controlled the market for parts with respect to its automobiles known as the “after market parts”. This action was commenced on August 16, 1996. The amended complaint alleged that at the instigation of a competitor of plaintiff, namely Carriage Ho.use,…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Daniel v. American Board of Emergency MedicineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Todd v. Exxon Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Lewis v. Philip Morris Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Joblove v. Barr Labs. Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- In Re Currency Conversion Fee Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.