Jaquish v. Jaquish
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtButzel, C. J.
Gladys Jaquish in a bill for separate 'maintenance against Lewis Jaquish specifically mentioned 3 Comp. Laws 1929, § 12794 (Stat. Ann. § 25.211). Her main charge is that he was guilty of misconduct with other women and that after admitting his guilt and promising to reform and refrain from further conduct of a like kind, he continued such improper relations. The judge awarded her a decree of absolute divorce. During the hearing she stated that she had asked only for separate maintenance because of religious scruples against divorce. When assured by the attorney for defendant that she was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Westgate v. WestgateMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Stevens v. StevensMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Cole v. ColeMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Horning v. HorningMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Litynski v. LitynskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rex v. RexMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
- McCoy v. McCoyMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
- Kinek v. KinekMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
- Shields v. ShieldsMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
- Bielefeld v. BielefeldMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.