Legal Opinion

Litynski v. Litynski

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1924No. Docket No. 60PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

Defendant appeals from a decree for support and maintenance of the plaintiff, granted pursuant to the provisions of section 11479 et seq., 3 Comp. Laws 1915, which awarded to her the household furniture and certain other property, the custody of the two minor children, aged 11 and 7 years, respectively, and the payment to her by defendant of $15 per week. Early in the trial, objection was made to the introduction of proof of defendant’s earn ings, for the reason that the bill did not specifically pray for separate maintenance under section 11479. Hagerty v. Hagerty, 222 Mich. 166. Plaintiff…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cole v. ColeMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Hagerty v. HagertyMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Lacey v. LaceyMichigan Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jaquish v. JaquishMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Stouten v. StoutenMichigan Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API