Legal Opinion
Greenberg v. Bradford City
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 27, 1968No. Appeal, 215PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Eagen,
In this action of mandamus, the court below sustained preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer to the complaint and entered judgment for the defendants. The plaintiffs appealed.
Bradford, Pennsylvania, a city of the Third Class, duly adopted a charter, pursuant to the authority given by Article XV, §1 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania, as implemented by ..the Optional Third Class City Charter Law, Act of July 15, 1957, P. L. 901, 53 P.S. 41101. Subsequently, it enacted a comprehensive program for compensation for its employees, including policemen and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lennox v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Ebald v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Ebald v. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1956
3Cited by23 opinions
- CITY COUN. OF BETHLEHEM v. MarcincinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Shoemaker v. City of Lock HavenDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- Katzenmoyer v. City of Reading, PADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- Kadash v. City of WilliamsportCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Herriman v. CarducciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.