Legal Opinion

Johnson Farms v. McEnroe

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 2000No. 990297PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] Johnson Farms, a general partnership, appealed from a judgment dismissing its action against George and Donna McEnroe for specific performance of an oral agreement for the purchase of real property, but awarding Johnson Farms $91,930 it overpaid the McEnroes for an adjacent parcel of property Johnson Farms purchased in January 1994. The McEnroes cross-appealed from the part of the judgment awarding Johnson Farms $91,930 plus interest. We conclude the trial court’s pivotal findings of fact in this case are inconsistent and incapable of reconciliation. We reverse and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. Jefferson Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Johnson Farms v. McEnroeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Barta v. HindsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Binstock v. Fort Yates Public School District No. 4North Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Bob Anderson Pontiac, Inc. v. DavidsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Giese v. GieseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Johnson Farms v. McEnroeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. In the Interest of N.S.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Johnson Farms v. McEnroeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Johnson Farms v. McEnroeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API