General Electric Co. v. Bucyrus-Erie Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
STEWART, District Judge:
Plaintiffs are corporations organized under the laws of the United Kingdom and are minority shareholders of defendant Ruston-Bucyrus, likewise a British corporation. They bring this action both individually and derivatively for alleged wrongs which they contend violate both the antitrust laws of the United States and also certain fiduciary duties owed them by defendant BucyrusErie, the majority shareholder in Ruston-Bucyrus. Bucyrus-Erie is a United States corporation. Before us is a motion by Ruston-Bucyrus (“Ruston”) to dismiss for lack of personal…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Goldlawr, Inc. v. HeimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- In Re Magnetic Audiotape Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Go-Video, Inc. v. Akai Electric Company, Ltd., and Matsushita Electric Industrial Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- KM Enterprises Incorporated v. Global Traffic Technologies InCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- In Re: Automotive Refinishing Paint Antitrust Litigation Basf Ag and Basf Coatings AgCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Chrysler Corp. v. General Motors Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1984
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.