Legal Opinion

Brod v. Sioux Honey Ass'n, Cooperative

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 11, 2012No. C-12-1322 EMCPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

Docket No. 25.

EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Gregory Brod (“Brod”) filed the instant class action lawsuit against Defendant Sioux Honey Association Cooperative (“Sioux Honey”) alleging that it violated state law by marketing its “Sue Bee Clover Honey” in California as “Honey,” despite the fact that it did not contain pollen. Plaintiff argues that by not containing pollen, Sioux Honey’s product did not meet applicable standards for “Honey” established in California’s Food and Agricultural Code. Brod’s suit asserts causes of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brod v. Sioux Honey Ass'n, CooperativeDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2013
  2. Perea v. Walgreen Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2013
  3. Reese v. Odwalla, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
  4. Regan v. Sioux Honey Ass'n CooperativeDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API