Perea v. Walgreen Co.
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS
DAVID O. CARTER, District Judge.
Julie Barrera, Courtroom Clerk.
Before the Court is Walgreen Company’s (“Walgreens’s” or “Defendant’s”) Motion to Dismiss under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) (Dkt. 5). The Court finds this matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.Civ.P. 78; Local Rule 7-15. After considering the moving, opposing, and replying papers the Court DENIES Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss under Rule 12(b)(1), but GRANTS Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss under 12(b)(6).
I. Background
Judge…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Penermon v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Tuan Anh Le v. Bank of New York MellonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Baum v. J-B Weld Company, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
- Carrie Calcagno and Praveen Pathangi, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. The Scotts Company LLC and Does 1-20District Court, S.D. California · 2026
- Colon v. NCAADistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.