Legal Opinion

National Surety Co. v. American Savings Bank & Trust Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1918No. 14304PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Jurey, J., entered February 2,1917, upon findings in favor of cross-complainant, in an action of interpleader, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtEllis, C. J.

In December, 1909, one Paul Steenstrup entered into a contract with the city of Seattle for the improvement of Western avenue. He furnished the statutory bond conditioned as required by the act of 1909, Laws of 1909, p. 716, Bern. Code, § 1159, with the National Surety Company as surety. To finance the work, the contractor made an arrangement with American Savings Bank & Trust Company to advance the necessary money as the work progressed, giving to the bank an assignment of all moneys to become due under the contract. This assignment was on a city form, and at its foot, beneath the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. National Surety Co. v. Bratnober Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Northwestern National Bank v. Guardian Casualty & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Washington National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Dowling v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. First National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Harris v. HarrisNevada Supreme Court · 1948
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. First Nat. Bank of LincolnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. RyanWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Pacific Coast Steel Co. v. Old National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. City of AuburnWashington Supreme Court · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API