Legal Opinion
Hugo Stinnes Steel & Metals Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
Decided June 20, 1978No. C.D. No. 4753. Court No. 73-2-00485PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOE, Judge:
The plaintiff has filed a motion for summary judgment contesting the imposition of a supplemental duty in the amount of 10% ad valorem under item 948.00, Tariff Schedules of the United States, pursuant to Presidential Proclamation 4074, 36 F.R. 15724 (1971). The merchandise upon which the supplemental duty was assessed consisted of 415 coils of cold rolled steel sheets, shipped from Japan on July 17, 1971 to Antwerp, Belgium, shipped therefrom to the United States on September 25, 1971 and entered at the port of Toledo, Ohio on or about November 4, 1971. A protest to the assessment…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Swan & Finch Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- The United States v. New York Merchandise Co., Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- United States v. Yoshida International, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
- Cerro De Pasco Copper Corp. v. Knut Knutsen, O. A. S.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Suwannee Steamship Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Michelin Tire Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
- Michelin Tire Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
- Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1982
- United States v. Hugo Stinnes Steel & Metals Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979